Biosingularity

Irrational decisions driven by emotions

Posted on: August 5, 2006

Irrational behaviour arises as a consequence of emotional reactions evoked when faced with difficult decisions, according to new research at UCL (University College London), funded by the Wellcome Trust. The UCL study suggests that rational behaviour may stem from an ability to override automatic emotional responses, rather than an absence of emotion per se.

It has long been assumed in classical theories of economics that people act entirely rationally when taking decisions. However, it has increasingly become recognized that humans often act irrationally, as a consequence of biasing influences. For example, people are strongly and consistently affected by the way in which a question is presented. An operation that has 40 per cent probability of success seems more appealing than one that has a 60 per cent chance of failure.

In the study, published in the journal Science, UCL researchers used a gambling experiment to establish the cognitive basis for rational decision-making. The goal of the task was to accumulate as much money as possible, with the incentive of being paid in real money in proportion to the money won during the experiment. Participants were given a starting amount of money (£50) at the beginning of each trial. They were then asked to choose between either a sure option or a gamble option (where they would have a certain chance of winning the entire amount, but also of losing it all). Subjects were presented with these choices under two different frames (i.e. scenarios), in which the sure option was worded either as the amount to be kept from the starting amount (“keep £20″), or the amount to be deducted (“lose £30″). The two options, although worded differently, would result in exactly the same outcome, i.e. that the participant would be left with £20.

The UCL study found that participants were more likely to gamble at the threat of losing £30 than the offer of keeping £20. On average, when presented with the “keep” option, participants chose to gamble 43 per cent of the time compared with 62 per cent for the “lose” option. Furthermore, there was a marked difference in behaviour between participants. Some people adopted a more rational approach and gambled more equally and consistently under both frames, while others showed a real aversion to risk in the “keep” frame while at the same time displaying high risk-seeking behaviour in the “lose” frame.

Brain imaging revealed that the amygdala, a region thought to control our emotions and mediate the ‘fight or flight’ reaction, underpinned this bias in the decision process. Moreover, the UCL study revealed that people with more rational behaviour had greater brain activity in the prefrontal cortex, a region known to be involved in higher-order executive processes, suggesting that their brains are better able to incorporate their emotions into a more balanced reasoning process.

Mr Benedetto de Martino, of the UCL Institute of Neurology, says: “It is well known that human choices are affected by the way in which a question is phrased. For example, saying an operation carries an 80 per cent survival rate may trigger a different response compared to saying that an operation has a 20 per cent chance of dying from it, even though they offer exactly the same degree of risk.

“Our study provides neurobiological evidence that an amygdala-based emotional system underpins this biasing of human decisions. Moreover, we found that people are rational, or irrational, to widely differing amounts. Interestingly, the amygdala was active across all participants, regardless of whether they behaved rationally or irrationally, suggesting that everyone experiences an emotional reaction when faced with such choices. However, we found that more rational individuals had greater activation in their orbitofrontal cortex (a region of prefrontal cortex) suggesting that rational individuals are able to better manage or perhaps override their emotional responses.”

Source: University College London  

About these ads

5 Responses to "Irrational decisions driven by emotions"

[...] I was talking with my uncle a couple weeks ago about trading. He is a chess master and I told him how the most difficult part of trading is that it is so easy to break your own rules. He couldn’t really understand how that could be hard. It does seem simple to just follow a few basic rules and I had a hard time trying to explain to him why it isn’t so easy. Well, according to new research at the University College London, “irrational behaviour arises as a consequence of emotional reactions evoked when faced with difficult decisions.” In order to trade rationally – to follow your system without fail – a trader needs the ability to override these automatic emotional responses. “Our study provides neurobiological evidence that an amygdala-based emotional system underpins this biasing of human decisions. Moreover, we found that people are rational, or irrational, to widely differing amounts. Interestingly, the amygdala was active across all participants, regardless of whether they behaved rationally or irrationally, suggesting that everyone experiences an emotional reaction when faced with such choices. However, we found that more rational individuals had greater activation in their orbitofrontal cortex (a region of prefrontal cortex) suggesting that rational individuals are able to better manage or perhaps override their emotional responses.” [...]

Of course, brain activities are interrupeted when emotions are high and active. Like we make irrational decisions when we are mad or not in a good mood. And this just happens to me all time and I would regret that. Very well-researche blog by the way!

[...] would hate to tell you this but most decisions are driven by emotions.  That means, you have a decision you make based on the emotions you have and as a consequence [...]

My wife and i just had a small argument. Then she just grabbed the car keys and drove somewhere without telling me where. This is irrational behaviour and for sure based on emotion. Hopefully she’s not going to do something she’ll / we will regret which is a high posibility since she’s acting irrationally.

Well she’s back, so she didn’t do something too irrational. Just probably time to herself.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 936 other followers

Follow me on Twitter

Medical Professional Database Award

 Doctor

Visitors Now

who's online

Blog Stats

  • 1,407,706 hits

Categories

Top Rated

Flickr Photos

Truro Vineyards of Cape Cod

great wall

Hidden Towers

Le Roi et sa cour - The King and his court

Waiting For Her Perfect Catch!

Automne

the fifteenth trump

A field of contrast ..

34 Sede de la SGAE A. García Abril Interior pórtico pétreo al jardín 5397. EXPLORE nº5 Octubre 31 de 2014

The WOW sky II

More Photos

Maps

Networked blogs

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 936 other followers

%d bloggers like this: