<a href="Look at our own blog site too
http://www.healthmedicinelab.com/blood-clot-in-lung/

So an underlying condition of higher inflammation in these anxiety-prone mice may cause both their higher cancer severity AND their anxiety disposition.

Anxiety itself may have no direct effect on cancer severity.

Several mental conditions, from anxiety to depression to schizophrenia, are linked to increased inflammation.

The state of inflammation itself may be caused by chronic microbial infection in the body.

I would be wary of that blood-type diet. It isn’t based on real science and is full of speculation. My doctor told me that out of all the questionable diets out there this one is the worst. It is pseudo science for sure.

The milk industry started this campaign about 5 years ago to capture sales from the lucrative exercise recovery drink market. In the process, they funded research at various institutions to try and show that milk is the best recovery drink after weightlifting even though the conclusions of the studies such as this one don’t support this since they’re comparing milk to a soy beverage and a carbohydrate drink. They didn’t compare milk to the other post-exercise drinks that weight lifters commonly consume like muscle milk and other more sophisticated recovery drinks. We know that glutamine, dextrose (to turn off the catabolic hormone, cortisol), BCAAs, protein and many other compounds aid in recovery above and beyond what plain old milk does. Nice try by the dairy industry, however. More recently they’ve plastered ads all over the gyms I go to furthering this campaign by promoting chocolate milk and regular milk as a post-recovery drink. I’d rather not have all that acid and mucus in my stomach, thanks.

The only thing this study tells you is that fat-free milk is better than this particular soy beverage which is Genisoy and is a very low-quality soy product. With obvious conflicts of interest like this, they really should have done a double-blind study. The fact that the main researcher is funded by the dairy industry should be enough to raise some serious questions about the validity and motives of this study. We don’t know how well each group performed in the gym since they state that there was an 86% compliance rate or, what else the subjects were eating the rest of the day, etc. Having the researchers knowing which group was consuming milk could have affected how they encouraged or guided the subjects in the gym.

People should know that milk raises the acid load in the body causing the body to pull alkaline-forming minerals from the bones like calcium and magnesium which leads to a net loss in calcium. If you’ve ever wondered why the countries that consume the most dairy have the highest rate of osteoperosis, this is a likely cause. Also, more than one study has shown casein, one of the proteins in milk, to be a cancer promoter. As people have pointed out, milk increases mucus production which makes it easier to catch colds and can fill up the lungs to dangerous levels especially in those who are lactose-intolerant. Most African Americans are lactose-intolerant and we’re the only species to consume milk after being weaned from breast milk especially the milk of another species. This doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s unhealthy but it should make people question whether this practice is a good idea and not just assume that it’s natural because it’s been driven into our heads by the dairy industry’s prolific advertising campaigns that start with the lunch programs when we’re in elementary school.

I used to drink a lot of milk in high school thinking I was being extra healthy not knowing that lactose-intolerance is so common and that I was lactose-intolerant. I was a victim of the dairy industry’s campaign of misinformation hiding anything that raises questions about whether cow’s milk is healthy. My stomach was like the insides of a volcano after my meals and I didn’t know why. Of course they excluded lactose-intolerant people from the study.

The editor should know that feeding cows steroids/hormones is a standard practice with factory farms which is where most of the milk comes from. It doesn’t require a scientific study as you requested but I can show you the evidence if you really think there’s any question in this. The only milk that doesn’t have antibiotics and hormones is organic milk and this study didn’t specify the use of organic milk and wasn’t likely used. The growth hormones could have played a role in this study. The estrogens in milk are probably what’s causing females to hit puberty sooner but I’m not claiming this as fact.

There are also plant-based meal replacements with a variety of protein sources that have excellent amino acid profiles and that are full of healthy anti-oxidents and alkaline forming superfoods that also reduce inflammation. Muscle size isn’t the only thing to consider. We don’t even know what’s causing the muscles to measure bigger since the study says that there were no differences in the strength gains.

I would like to see a comparison of milk with other post-recovery drinks that people actually consume and not just a soy drink that probably no one consumes as a post-recovery drink so one can actually say that milk is a good post-recover drink. Until then, no one can say that milk is an excellent post-recovery drink like Dr. Phillips states.